Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 4.9% 51 Fragile Recovery
2023 9.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 6.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 1.9% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 14.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 13.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 10.1% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 2.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 12.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 18.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 11.3% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 11.1% 42 Fragile Recovery
2012 11.7% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 13.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Amy Heald Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
Amy Heald Executive Director 0.7% of Rev
John Tozzi Board President
Edie Cartwright Board President
Lloyd Rogers Board President
Holly Walton-Buchanan Secretary
Patrick Ellingsworth Treasurer
Les Cohen Board Member
Ron Luschar Board Member
Jennifer Smith Board Member
Barbara Fox Board Member
Eric Lovejoy Board Member
Christopher Piekarz Board Member
Robert Seale Board Member
Judith Simpson Board Member
John Tozzi Board President
Edie Cartwright Board President
Cleta Dillard Board President
Holly Walton-Buchanan Secretary
Patrick Ellingsworth Treasurer
Les Cohen Board Member
Ron Luschar Board Member
Gail McAllister Board Member
Lloyd Rogers Board Member
Jennifer Smith Board Member
Kay Dean Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS MAYES Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
THOMAS MAYES Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
CLETA DILLARD Board President
FRED JAKOLAT Secretary
TASHA REISZ Treasurer
AMY BOOTH Board Member
KAY DEAN Board Member
MARK MACDONALD Board Member
GAIL MCALLISTER Board Member
LLOYD ROGERS Board Member
JUDY SIMPSON Board Member
WILLIAM DOUGLASS Board Member
JANE NICHOLS Board Member
RENEE JACOBS Board Member
HOLLY WALTON-BUCHANAN Board Member
JENNIFER SMITH Board President
JOHN TOZZI Board President
CLETA DILLARD Board President
FRED JAKOLAT Secretary
KAY DEAN Treasurer
EDIE CARTWRIGHT Board Member
LES COHEN Board Member
MARK MACDONALD Board Member
GAIL MCALLISTER Board Member
LLOYD ROGERS Board Member
RON LUSCHAR Board Member
RENEE JACOBS Board Member
HOLLY WALTON-BUCHANAN Board Member
PAT ELLINGSWORTH Board Member
JENNIFER SMITH Board President
JOHN TOZZI Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in NV with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.