Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 14.5% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 12.8% 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 23.0% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 50 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 17.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 17.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 11.1% 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 13.8% 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 12.2% 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 15.9% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 17.1% 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 9.7% 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATE BIDEAUX Board Member
CATHAY CHRISTENSEN Board Member
LINDA DURBANO Board Member
AARON FRITZ Board Member
DOUG FULLERTON Board Member
ERICH GOECKERITZ Board Member
CAMERON HUBBARD VICE PRESIDE
DAVID ISAACS Board Member
BROOKE KARRINGTON Board Member
MORGAN KEYES Board Member
ALAN LUNT Board Member
MANDIANNE ORTON Board Member
AVALINE PETERSEN Board Member
JILL SJOBLOM Secretary
SUE WILKERSON Board President
PATRICK POCE EXECUTIVE DI

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUDI AMSEL ADVISORY MEM
DELORES BERTAGNOLLI Board Member
BOYD BINGHAM ADVISORY MEM
SHERIE CHARLESWORTH Board Member
COREY COMBE ADVISORY MEM
KEARSTON CUTRUBUS Board Member
MERI DECARIA ADVISORY MEM
AARON FRITZ Board Member
DOUG FULLERTON Board Member
KATHY HANCHETT ADVISORY MEM
ADAM HENSLEY Board Member
STEVE KAUFMAN Board Member
MORGAN KEYES Board Member
LORA KIER Board Member
SHARON MARKOS Board Member
LISA MURPHY Board Member
BRENT PARKIN Board Member
NICK PERRY Board Member
REGGIE PETERSON Board Member
STEVE POORMAN ADVISORY MEM
COLLETTE TORGHELE ADVISORY MEM
CURTIS WAHLEN ADVISORY MEM
RICHARD WHITE ADVISORY MEM
SUE WILKERSON Board Member
SUE WILKERSON Board Member
PATRICK POCE EXECUTIVE DI

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUDI AMSEL ADVISORY MEM
DELORES BERTAGNOLLI Board Member
BOYD BINGHAM ADVISORY MEM
SHERIE CHARLESWORTH Board Member
COREY COMBE ADVISORY MEM
KEARSTON CUTRUBUS Board Member
MERI DECARIA ADVISORY MEM
AARON FRITZ Board Member
DOUG FULLERTON Board Member
KATHY HANCHETT ADVISORY MEM
ADAM HENSLEY Board Member
STEVE KAUFMAN Board Member
MORGAN KEYES Board Member
LORA KIER Board Member
REED LOVELAND Board Member
SHARON MARKOS Board Member
LISA MURPHY Board Member
BRENT PARKIN Board Member
NICK PERRY Board Member
REGGIE PETERSON Board Member
STEVE POORMAN ADVISORY MEM
COLLETTE TORGHELE ADVISORY MEM
CURTIS WAHLEN ADVISORY MEM
RICHARD WHITE ADVISORY MEM
SUE WILKERSON Board Member
PATRICK POCE EXECUTIVE DI
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 19 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.