Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
25
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 37.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 29.7% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 8.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael O'Leary Executive Director 96.4% of Rev
Louis DiGioia Chief Operating Officer 35.4% of Rev
Bryan Braunlich Executive Director 26.9% of Rev
Erin Von Hoetzendorff Board Member 17.1% of Rev
Mike Bowers Board President
Tori Baker Board President
Brian Schultz Secretary
Josh Nations Treasurer
Mark Mayfield Board Member
Luis Olloqui Board Member
Michelle Maddalena Board Member
Casey Collins Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Fithian Executive Director 74.5% of Rev
Jackie Brenneman Board President 40.3% of Rev
Lou DiGioia Chief Financial Officer 14.9% of Rev
Bryan Braunlich Exec. Dir. The Cinema Foundation 13.2% of Rev
Tori Baker Board President
Brian Schultz Secretary
Eduardo Acuna Treasurer
Frank Tees Board Member
Adam Cassels Board Member
Michelle Maddalena Board Member
Josh Nations Board Member
Michael O'Leary Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in DC for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 37.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~32 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.