Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 39 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RICHARD FRANKLIN | Board President | — | ||
| KAREN HOFFMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| ERIN WALLER | Secretary | — | ||
| SANDRA BILLINGSLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| BOB GASKILL | Board Member | — | ||
| ELLIOT PEREZ | Board Member | — | ||
| JOAN SCHROEDER | Board Member | — | ||
| RANDY TEEGARDIN | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICHAEL ANTON | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| SANDRA BILLINGSLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| RICHARD FRANKLIN | Board President | — | ||
| BOB GASKILL | Board Member | — | ||
| KAREN HOFFMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| ELLIOT PEREZ | Board Member | — | ||
| JOAN SCHROEDER | Board Member | — | ||
| RANDY TEEGARDIN | Board Member | — | ||
| ERIN WALLER | Secretary | — | ||
| MICHAEL ANTON | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| SANDRA BILLINGSLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| RICHARD FRANKLIN | Board President | — | ||
| BOB GASKILL | Board Member | — | ||
| KAREN HOFFMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| ELLIOT PEREZ | Board Member | — | ||
| JOAN SCHROEDER | Board Member | — | ||
| ERIN WALLER | Secretary | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 15 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 20 points below the peer median (40 vs. 60).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.