Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 48 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RICHARD FRANKLIN Board President —
KAREN HOFFMAN Treasurer —
ERIN WALLER Secretary —
SANDRA BILLINGSLEY Board Member —
BOB GASKILL Board Member —
ELLIOT PEREZ Board Member —
JOAN SCHROEDER Board Member —
RANDY TEEGARDIN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL ANTON VICE PRESIDE —
SANDRA BILLINGSLEY Board Member —
RICHARD FRANKLIN Board President —
BOB GASKILL Board Member —
KAREN HOFFMAN Treasurer —
ELLIOT PEREZ Board Member —
JOAN SCHROEDER Board Member —
RANDY TEEGARDIN Board Member —
ERIN WALLER Secretary —
MICHAEL ANTON VICE PRESIDE —
SANDRA BILLINGSLEY Board Member —
RICHARD FRANKLIN Board President —
BOB GASKILL Board Member —
KAREN HOFFMAN Treasurer —
ELLIOT PEREZ Board Member —
JOAN SCHROEDER Board Member —
ERIN WALLER Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 41 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (40 vs. 73).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.