Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — — 44 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lorenzo Marasso Board President —
Wayne Marshall Board Member —
Natalie Ingrisano Secretary —
Melissa Plagemann Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lorenzo Marasso Board President —
Saeunn Thorsteinsdottir Board President —
Colleen Donovan Executive Director —
Wayne Marshall Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christophe Chagnard Board Member —
Lorenzo Marasso Board President —
Saeunn Thorsteinsdottir Board President —
Colleen Donovan Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (75 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.