Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↓
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.1% 44 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAOMI MCDOUGALL JONES EXECUTIVE DI 11.2% of Rev
TIM BLACK Board President —
ERYN ALVEY VICE PRESIDE —
JANE ROSEN Secretary —
TOM HARNED Treasurer —
JOAN DAVIES Board Member —
TOM CARTER Board Member —
MARTY KAPLAN Board Member —
ALEXIS LINDBERG Board Member —
DAVID GERTZ Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAOMI MCDOUGALL JONES EXECUTIVE DI 7.1% of Rev
TIM BLACK Board President —
ERYN ALVEY VICE PRESIDE —
JANE ROSEN Secretary —
TOM HARNED Treasurer —
JOAN DAVIES Board Member —
TOM CARTER Board Member —
MARTY KAPLAN Board Member —
ALEXIS LINDBERG Board Member —
DAVID GERTZ Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA MCCAIN Board President —
JACKIE COLE VICE PRESIDE —
THOMAS ANDREWS Treasurer —
JANE ROSEN Secretary —
GWYNN AUGUST Board Member —
JOAN DAVIES Board Member —
SHIELA SUMMERS Board Member —
JD MCDONNELL EXECUTIVE DI —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 43 other orgs in ID with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points below the peer median (25 vs. 59).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.