Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
42
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 5.5% 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 6.4% 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 38 Fragile Recovery
2020 11.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 10.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF FISHER DEVELOPMENT 1.4% of Rev
CODY SWENSON Executive Director 1.2% of Rev
ANNE SWENSON Artistic Director 1.1% of Rev
TROY ANDERSON IT AND OPERATIONS 1.0% of Rev
CODY HALE Board Member 0.9% of Rev
LINDA HALE Board Member 0.9% of Rev
MARK OSTLER Treasurer 0.9% of Rev
JASON BALDWIN TECHNICAL MANAGER 0.9% of Rev
BILL WOAHN Board President 0.4% of Rev
ANNE BROWN Board Member
CARL HERNANDEZ Board Member
WILLIAM JEFFS Board Member
JANI RADEBAUGH Board Member
LINCOLN WESTCOTT Board Member
JEFF WILKS Board Member
DAVID DOXEY Board Member
DERRIN HILL Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF FISHER DEVELOPMENT 1.1% of Rev
CODY SWENSON EXECUTIVE DI 1.0% of Rev
ANNE SWENSON Artistic Director 0.8% of Rev
LINDA HALE EDUCATION DI 0.8% of Rev
CODY HALE TECHNICAL DI 0.8% of Rev
ANNE BROWN Board Member
CARL HERNANDEZ Board Member
WILLIAM JEFFS Board Member
MISSY LARSEN Board Member
KAREN MCCANDLESS Board Member
JANI RADEBAUGH Board Member
LINCOLN WESTCOTT Board Member
JEFF WILKS BOARD CHAIRM

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CODY SWENSON EXECUTIVE DI 1.0% of Rev
CODY SWENSON EXECUTIVE DI 0.9% of Rev
CODY SWENSON EXECUTIVE DI 0.9% of Rev
LINDA HALE EDUCATION DI 0.8% of Rev
CODY HALE TECHNICAL DI 0.8% of Rev
ANNE SWENSON Artistic Director 0.8% of Rev
LINDA HALE EDUCATION DI 0.7% of Rev
CODY HALE TECHNICAL DI 0.7% of Rev
ANNE SWENSON Artistic Director 0.7% of Rev
LINDA HALE EDUCATION DI 0.7% of Rev
CODY HALE TECHNICAL DI 0.7% of Rev
ANNE SWENSON Artistic Director 0.7% of Rev
CARL HERNANDEZ BOARD CHAIRM
WILLIAM JEFFS Board Member
KAREN MCCANDLESS Board Member
MAREN MOURITSEN Board Member
LINCOLN WESTCOTT Board Member
JEFF WILKS VICE CHAIRMA
CARL HERNANDEZ BOARD CHAIRM
WILLIAM JEFFS Board Member
KAREN MCCANDLESS Board Member
MAREN MOURITSEN Board Member
LINCOLN WESTCOTT Board Member
JEFF WILKS VICE CHAIRMA
CARL HERNANDEZ BOARD CHAIRM
WILLIAM JEFFS Board Member
KAREN MCCANDLESS Board Member
MAREN MOURITSEN Board Member
LINCOLN WESTCOTT Board Member
JEFF WILKS VICE CHAIRMA
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 81 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.