Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
37
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 4.2% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 5.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 6.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 2.4% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — 3.5% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — 3.3% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — 2.9% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 — — 3.4% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — 4.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — 4.1% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FELICIA BACA Board Member 4.7% of Rev
JEFF DRIGGS Board Member 0.0% of Rev
CAITLIN TURSIC Treasurer 0.0% of Rev
HANNAH NIELSEN Board Member 0.0% of Rev
SUSAN KOLES RICKMAN Board Member 0.0% of Rev
LANA TAYLOR Board Member 0.0% of Rev
TRAVIS ENGLISH Board President 0.0% of Rev
GABRIELLA HUGGINS Board Member —
CUAUHTEMOC SANDOVAL Secretary —
KATHY DAVIS Board Member —
EUGENIE JAFFE Board Member —
MATTHEW COLES Board President —
IGNACIO ROSENBERG Board Member —
RYAN CANTER Board Member —
SABRINA MARTINEZ Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FELICIA BACA Board Member 3.7% of Rev
TORLE NENBEE Board Member —
ERIKA HILL Board Member —
SONALI LOOMBA Board Member —
THOMAS KESSINGER Board Member —
JOSANNE GLASS Board Member —
MATTHEW CASTILLO Board Member —
ANNIE DAYTON Board Member —
AYANNA ALLEN Board Member —
RICHARD TAYLOR Board Member —
ANDREA ASHDOWN Board Member —
KATHY DAVIS Board Member —
KATHERINE POTTER Board Member —
SARAH LONGORIA Board Member —
CALE NEWHOUSE Treasurer —
SUSAN KOLES RICKMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FELICIA BACA Board Member 3.6% of Rev
SONALI LOOMBA Board Member —
TORLE NENBEE Board Member —
SUSAN KOLES RICKMAN Board Member —
SARAH LONGORIA Board Member —
JOSANNE GLASS Board Member —
NICO DICOU Board Member —
ERIKA HILL Board Member —
LARRY COHEN Board Member —
ANDREA ASHDOWN Board Member —
KATHERINE POTTER Board Member —
ANNIE DAYTON Board Member —
KATHY DAVIS Board Member —
DAVE MORTENSEN Board Member —
MATTHEW CASTILLO Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FELICIA BACA Executive Director 3.4% of Rev
JARED JONES Board Member —
KANIKA WELCH Board Member —
KATHERINE POTTER Board Member —
LARRY COHEN Board Member —
EFREN CORADO GARCIA Board Member —
ANNIE DAYTON Board Member —
MATTHEW CASTILLO Treasurer —
LEAH LANGAN Board Member —
DAVE MORTENSEN Board Member —
ANDREA ASHDOWN Board Member —
STEVE BARTH Board Member —
KATHY DAVIS Board Member —
ERIKA HILL Board Member —
SUSAN KOLES RICKMAN Board Member —
TORLE NENBEE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 115 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (5 vs. 46).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.