Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
45
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 2.9% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 2.6% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 1.8% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 4.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 3.3% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 3.7% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 3.7% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 3.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 4.6% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 3.7% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 5.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 5.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 6.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDA C SMITH Board Member 1.6% of Rev
PAUL CHUNG Board Member
JOHN G FRANCIS Board Member
SWECHHA GHIMIRE Board Member
MICHAEL HAMBLIN Board Member
JONATHAN HICKERSON Treasurer
JATHAN JANOVE Board Member
JEN JENKINS Board President
JOANNA JOHNSTON Board Member
LINDSAY MATTES Board President
HADLEY RAMPTON Board Member
KAREN THOMPSON Board Member
JONATHAN VAAS Secretary
LYNNE WIMMER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDA C SMITH Board Member 1.6% of Rev
PAUL CHUNG Board Member
JOHN G FRANCIS Board Member
MICHAEL HAMBLIN Board Member
JONATHAN HICKERSON Board Member
JAELYNN JENKINS Board President
JENN JENKINS Board Member
JOANNA JOHNSTON Treasurer
LINDSAY MATTES Board Member
HADLEY RAMPTON Board Member
KAREN THOMPSON Board President
JONATHAN VAAS Secretary
LYNNE WIMMER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDA C SMITH Board Member 2.9% of Rev
PAUL CHUNG Board Member
DAVID FRANCIS Board Member
MICHAEL HAMBLIN Board Member
JONATHAN HICKERSON Board Member
JAELYNN JENKINS Board President
JENN JENKINS Board Member
JOANNA JOHNSTON Treasurer
LINDSAY MATTES Board Member
HADLEY RAMPTON Board Member
KAREN THOMPSON Board President
DAVID TUNDERMAN Board Member
JONATHAN VAAS Secretary
LYNNE WIMMER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDA C SMITH Board Member 2.8% of Rev
KATRINA BAIRD Board Member
RUSTY BOLLOW Board President
PAUL CHUNG Board Member
MICHAEL HAMBLIN Board Member
JONATHAN HICKERSON Board Member
JAELYNN JENKINS Board President
JOANNA JOHNSTON Treasurer
SKYE LAZARO Board Member
KANITA LIPJANKIC Board President
LINDSAY MATTES Board Member
GAZAL PALMER Board Member
GRACE PUSAVAT Board Member
HADLEY RAMPTON Board Member
KAREN THOMPSON Board President
DAVID TUNDERMANN Board President
JONATHAN VAAS Secretary
LYNNE WIMMER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 81 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.