Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 15.2% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 9.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.2% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — 11.0% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 10.1% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 12.8% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 12.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 13.2% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 19.1% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — 16.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 14.3% 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 25.2% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 — — 16.6% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Green Executive Director 11.9% of Rev
Judy Stern Board Member —
Michael Reed Board Member —
Marlene Rausch-Phinney Secretary —
Muriel Stone Johnson Board Member —
Yuna Kang Board Member —
Fran Dickman Board Member —
Ben Taylor Board Member —
Cheryl Mandala Treasurer —
Charlotte Smith Board Member —
Michael Maas Board President —
Dominique van de Stadt Board President —
Mort Scult Board Member —
Omer Bloyd Board Member —
Lynda Barber Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Green Executive Director 11.9% of Rev
Muriel Stone Johnson Board Member —
Judy Stern Board Member —
Michael Reed Board Member —
Ben Taylor Board Member —
Yuna Kang Board Member —
Fran Dickman Board Member —
Allan Winston Board Member —
Marlene Rausch-Phinney Secretary —
Cheryl Mandala Treasurer —
Charlotte Smith Board Member —
Michael Maas Board President —
Dominique van de Stadt Board President —
Amanda Chua Board Member —
Omer Bloyd Board Member —
Lynda Barber Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Green Executive Director 11.9% of Rev
Michael Maas Board President —
Charlotte Smith Secretary —
Cheryl Mandala Treasurer —
Dominique van de Stadt Board President —
Lynda Barber Board Member —
Omer Bloyd Board Member —
Amanda Chua Board Member —
Claire Harris Board Member —
Marlene Rausch-Phinney Board Member —
Michael Reed Board Member —
Judy Stern Board Member —
Muriel Stone Johnson Board Member —
Ben Taylor Board Member —
Allan Winston Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 147 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 43 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.