Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
—
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 91 Unknown —
2022 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 92 Unknown —
2021 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 83 Unknown —
2020 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 79 Unknown —
2019 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 90 Unknown —
2018 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 83 Unknown —
2017 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 91 Unknown —
2016 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 89 Unknown —
2015 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 76 Unknown —
2014 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 91 Unknown —
2013 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 85 Unknown —
2012 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 76 Unknown —

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.0% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KENNY GROSSMAN Artistic Director 11.6% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 11.2% of Rev
DEBRA CZAJKOWSKI Board Member 2.8% of Rev
ROBERT WALLER Board Member 2.1% of Rev
BOBBY SAMPLE Board Member 1.1% of Rev
VICKI GROSSMAN Board Member —
SABRINA HURLEY Board Member —
KELLY SWOPE Board Member —
CLANCY DEGROODT Board President —
STEVE ZELL Board President —
KAREN DOLYNIUK Secretary —
JUDY WOLFE Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KENNY GROSSMAN Artistic Director 13.7% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 6.6% of Rev
DEBRA CZAJKOWSKI Board Member 3.0% of Rev
BOBBY SAMPLE Board Member 2.3% of Rev
ROBERT WALLER Board Member 2.1% of Rev
VICKI GROSSMAN Board Member 0.5% of Rev
SUZANNE TREVINO Board Member —
SABRINA HURLEY Board Member —
CLANCY DEGROODT Board President —
STEVE ZELL Board President —
KAREN DOLYNIUK Secretary —
JUDY WOLFE Treasurer —

Tax year 2020

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 8.4% of Rev

Tax year 2019

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.3% of Rev

Tax year 2018

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 10.7% of Rev

Tax year 2017

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 10.0% of Rev

Tax year 2016

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.2% of Rev

Tax year 2015

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 8.1% of Rev

Tax year 2014

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 7.0% of Rev

Tax year 2013

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 6.1% of Rev

Tax year 2012

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 5.9% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 148 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (80 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 90 → 91 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.