Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 57 Fragile Recovery
2022 4.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REBECCA RIFFLE-BAKODY Executive Dir. 5.7% of Rev
URAINA PAYNE Board President
TERRY KETTENHOFEN Treasurer
ANN MARIE HARDESTY Secretary
CLYDE R NEVILLE Artistic Director
JULIET LAPOINTE Board Member
KAYLA BURKE Board Member
PATRICIA CAPANNA Board Member
DYLAN DI ANGELO Board Member
PATRICK FLACK Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA FIDDES EXECUTIVE DIREC 4.4% of Rev
KENNETH KASNER Board President
ADAM ENGLAND Treasurer
CLYDE R NEVILLE Artistic Director
MICHAEL INGERSON Board President
KITTY MACY Secretary
ELLIANA MASELLI Board Member
LUKAS SOLANO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 118 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 49 points above the peer median (80 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.