Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 22.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 45.5% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TONY BURDETTE Board President 24.5% of Rev
TONY BURDETTE Board President 22.2% of Rev
CALVIN BURFORD Board Member
JOY BURDETTE Secretary
HELEN BURFORD Treasurer
CALVIN BURFORD Board Member
HELEN BURFORD Treasurer
JOY BURDETTE Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TONY BURDETTE Board President 6.4% of Rev
HELEN BUFORD Treasurer
JOY BURDETTE Secretary
CALVIN BURFORD Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TONY BURDETTE Board President
HELEN BUFORD Treasurer
JOY BURDETTE Secretary
CALVIN BURFORD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points below the peer median (15 vs. 45).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.