Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score
Institutional Epochs
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | 48.6% | 42 | Fragile | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICHAEL KLOTZ | Board Member | 6.0% of Rev | ||
| ROBERT H SMITH | Board Member | 5.2% of Rev | ||
| ROBERT H SMITH | Board Member | 3.4% of Rev | ||
| YURIY BEKKER | Board Member | 2.9% of Rev | ||
| MICHAEL KLOTZ | Board Member | 2.9% of Rev | ||
| ANDRES CARDENES | Board President | — | ||
| GISELLE ELGARRESTA RIOS | Board Member | — | ||
| GARY LEVINSON | Board President | — | ||
| ANDRES CARDENES | Board President | — | ||
| GISELLE ELGARRESTA RIOS | Board Member | — | ||
| GARY LEVINSON | Board President | — | ||
| YURIY BEKKER | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 245 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points above the peer median (65 vs. 30).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Overall score has gone from 42 → 47 over 2 years (improving by 5 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.