Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | 24.5% | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RACHEL MAUSER | CO-EXEC DIRE | 15.2% of Rev | ||
| CAITLIN KANNAPELL | COEXECUTIVE | 12.5% of Rev | ||
| AMANDA EGAN | Board President | — | ||
| JANEY ANDRIS | Secretary | — | ||
| MARK COTTER | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RACHEL MAUSER | CO-EXEC DIRE | 14.1% of Rev | ||
| CAITLIN KANNAPELL | COEXECUTIVE | 10.4% of Rev | ||
| SHEREE HUBER WILLIAMS | Board President | — | ||
| MICHAEL YDOATE | OFFICER | — | ||
| JANEY ANDRIS | Secretary | — | ||
| MARK COTTER | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAITLIN KANNAPELL | COEXECUTIVE | 6.6% of Rev | ||
| RACHEL MAUSER | CO-EXEC DIRE | 4.9% of Rev | ||
| SHEREE HUBER WILLIAMS | Board President | — | ||
| MICHAEL YDOATE | Treasurer | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 56 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 24.5% is modestly above the sector's healthy band (18–22%) — worth monitoring.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 24.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.