Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
62
Score
Governance
40
Score
Financial
70
Score
Program
80
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2016 Hidden Hidden 2.5% 62 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 Hidden Hidden 2.5% 58 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2014 Hidden Hidden 0.5% 56 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 Hidden Hidden 2.7% 64 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.

Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
70 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
40 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
80 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
62 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 52 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 47 points above the peer median (80 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 64 → 62 over 4 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.