Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Hidden | Hidden | 2.5% | 62 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2015 | Hidden | Hidden | 2.5% | 58 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2014 | Hidden | Hidden | 0.5% | 56 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2013 | Hidden | Hidden | 2.7% | 64 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 52 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 47 points above the peer median (80 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 64 → 62 over 4 years (declining by 2 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 2.5% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
- Hanson, Joy holds 5 distinct authority roles, which creates concentration risk.
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.