Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 18.5% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 4.7% 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LESLIE COOPER Artistic Director 18.5% of Rev
BILLY WILEY Treasurer
RAYA BAKI Board Member
RACHEL FLIPPIN Board Member
CARRIE JOHNSTON Board Member
AARON REEL Board President
KATIE ROMERO Board President
MARCY BOURGEOIS MARKETING MEDIA
BRIAN NOE Board Member
AMY GREENE Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ASHLEY FLYNN Board Member
AMY GREENE Board Member
BILLY WILEY Board Member
MARCY BOURGEOIS Secretary
AARON REEL Board President
KATIE ROMERO Board President
LESLIE COOPER Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 19 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 15 points below the peer median (25 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.