Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
59
Score
Governance
32
Score
Financial
70
Score
Program
80
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 10.4% 59 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 Hidden Hidden 17.1% 62 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 Hidden Hidden 13.3% 61 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 Hidden Hidden 8.3% 68 Fragile Recovery
2019 Hidden Hidden 15.2% 59 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 Hidden Hidden 7.3% 61 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2017 Hidden Hidden 11.7% 65 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 Hidden Hidden 13.9% 68 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2015 Hidden Hidden 15.6% 57 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 Hidden Hidden 4.3% 76 Fragile Recovery
2013 Hidden Hidden 10.2% 58 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2012 Hidden Hidden 8.5% 72 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 Hidden Hidden 6.9% 80 Stable Stable Watch
2010 Hidden 76 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.

Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
70 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
32 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
80 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
59 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 51 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 48 points above the peer median (80 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.