Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
64
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
80
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 64 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 Hidden 64 Fragile Recovery
2022 Hidden 63 Fragile Recovery
2021 Hidden 64 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 Hidden 67 Fragile Recovery
2019 Hidden 57 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 Hidden 63 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2017 Hidden Hidden 66 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 Hidden Hidden 7.7% 67 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 Hidden Hidden 2.2% 66 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 Hidden Hidden 8.9% 67 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2012 Hidden Hidden 15.8% 57 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2011 Hidden Hidden 29.9% 63 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.

Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
80 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 3 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (80 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 67 → 64 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.