Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 52 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 56 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES GRIFFITH Executive Director 14.0% of Rev
PAUL L KING Board President —
MICHAEL EVERETT Board President —
ROBERT CLARKE Treasurer —
BRETT BACHMAN Board Member —
MICHAEL HINDUS Board Member —
KENNETH R MARVEL Board Member —
HERMAN SIEGELAAR Secretary —
NAT SLOANE Board Member —
MIKE CANNON Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE OVITSKY Executive Director 68.8% of Rev
DAVID KITTO Executive Director 8.7% of Rev
PETER FRANK Board President —
PAUL KING Board President —
MICHAEL EVERETT Board President —
ROBERT CLARKE Treasurer —
ALBERT KIDD Secretary —
BENJAMIN ALLISON Board Member —
BRETT BACHMAN Board Member —
DOUGLAS BROWN Board Member —
RICHARD CRONIN Board Member —
MICHAEL HINDUS Board Member —
KENNETH MARVEL Board Member —
HERMAN SIEGELAAR Board Member —
NAT SLOANE Board Member —
JAMES GRIFFITH Executive Director —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE OVITSKY Executive Director 43.9% of Rev
PETER FRANK Board President —
ALBERT KIDD Treasurer —
ROBERT CLARKE Secretary —
BRETT BACHMAN Board Member —
DOUGLAS BROWN Board Member —
RICHARD CRONIN Board Member —
MICHAEL HINDUS Board Member —
PAUL KING Board Member —
KENNETH MARVEL Board Member —
HERMAN SIEGELAAR Board Member —
NAT SLOANE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN OVITSKY EXECUTIVE DI 42.3% of Rev
DOUGLAS M BROWN Board Member —
RICHARD J CRONIN MD Board Member —
PAUL KING Board Member —
KENNETH R MARVEL Board Member —
HERMAN SIEGELAAR Board Member —
NAT SLOANE Board Member —
JILL COOPER UDALL Board Member —
MICHAEL EVERETT Board Member —
ALBERT KIDD Treasurer —
ROBERT L CLARKE Secretary —
JOHN BERGHOFF VICE PRESIDE —
PETER B FRANK Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN OVITSKY EXECUTIVE DI 43.3% of Rev
MICHAEL EVERETT Board Member —
JILL COOPER UDALL Board Member —
NAT SLOANE Board Member —
HERMAN SIEGELAAR Board Member —
KENNETH MARVEL Board Member —
PAUL KING Board Member —
RICHARD J CRONIN MD Board Member —
DOUGLAS BROWN Board Member —
ROBERT CLARKE Secretary —
ALBERT KIDD Treasurer —
PETER FRANK Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 18 points below the peer median (50 vs. 68).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.