Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag ↑
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — — 60 Stable Stable Watch
2020 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALETHEA HARTWELL Board President —
DAN COLEMAN Board President —
JESSICA MELENDEZ Secretary —
CONNIE HESTER Treasurer —
Board Member —
GUY MALONE Board Member —
RANDY NOLEN Board Member —
ADELE BOZEMAN Board Member —
HUGH TAYLOR Board Member —
BEVERLY BOOTS MEMEBER AT LARGE —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALETHEA HARTWELL Board President —
DAN COLEMAN Board President —
JESSICA MELENDEZ Secretary —
HUGH TAYLOR Treasurer —
Board Member —
GUY MALONE Board Member —
RANDY NOLEN Board Member —
ADELE BOZEMAN Board Member —
TRICIA HART Board Member —
CHRIS WIPPERMAN MEMEBER AT LARGE —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (90 vs. 58).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 57 over 5 years (improving by 22 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.