Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
23
Score
Governance
15
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
40
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2013 Hidden Hidden 14.5% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 Hidden Hidden 18.7% 10 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 Hidden Hidden 34.5% 9 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2010 Hidden 20 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.

Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
15 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
40 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 52 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 32 points below the peer median (15 vs. 47).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 20 → 23 over 4 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.