Acute Stabilization
What does this mean?
A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.
The Path Forward
The Dawn
Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Hidden | Hidden | 14.5% | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2012 | Hidden | Hidden | 18.7% | 10 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2011 | Hidden | Hidden | 34.5% | 9 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2010 | Hidden | — | — | 20 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 52 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 32 points below the peer median (15 vs. 47).
5-year trend: Acute Stabilization
A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.
Overall score has gone from 20 → 23 over 4 years (improving by 3 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 14.5% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
- Behrmann, Ron holds 6 distinct authority roles, which creates concentration risk.
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
- Governance score is in the bottom quartile of the sector, typically driven by compensation concentration or related authority clustering.
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
- Sustained governance crisis: score has stayed below 25 for 4 consecutive years — a chronic pattern.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.