Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
49
Score
Governance
40
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
100
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.0% 49 Fragile Recovery
2022 Hidden Hidden 13.3% 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 Hidden Hidden 4.1% 62 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 Hidden Hidden 9.9% 57 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 Hidden Hidden 5.8% 61 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 Hidden Hidden 5.4% 41 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 Hidden Hidden 6.2% 41 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 Hidden Hidden 5.8% 45 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2015 Hidden Hidden 6.4% 41 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2014 Hidden Hidden 6.6% 37 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2013 Hidden Hidden 6.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 Hidden Hidden 8.3% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 Hidden Hidden 8.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2010 Hidden Hidden 2,196.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2009 Hidden Hidden — 9 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HENRY AVERY Board Member 14.1% of Rev
HENRY AVERY EXECUTIVE DI 13.8% of Rev
PAULA STEIN Board President —
ROBERT L HAYES Board President —
JOCELYN CASTILLO Secretary —
MOLLY BACHECHI Board Member —
CHRIS CADE Board Member —
TERRY FARMER Board Member —
JUDITH MEAD Board Member —
DON MILLER Board Member —
KATIE SNAPP Board Member —
MITCH VIGIL Board Member —
CHARLOTTE WALTON Board Member —
ROBERT MARTIN EXECUTIVE DI —
PAULA STEIN Board President —
ROBERT L HAYES Treasurer —
JOCELYN CASTILLO Secretary —
MOLLY BACHECHI Board Member —
WALLY DRANGMEISTER Board Member —
TRUDY JONES Board Member —
JUDITH MEAD Board Member —
LARRY MILES Board Member —
KATIE SNAPP Board Member —
CHARLOTTE WALTON Board Member —
CHRISTINA WEST Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HENRY AVERY Executive Director 14.0% of Rev
PAULA STEIN Board President —
BOB HAYES Board President —
JOCELYN CASTILLO Treasurer —
MOLLY BACHECHI Board Member —
DON MILLER Board Member —
KATIE SNAPP Board Member —
CHARLOTTE WALTON Board Member —
TERRY FARMER Board Member —
MITCH VIGIL Board Member —
JUDITH MEADE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HENRY AVERY Executive Director 11.4% of Rev
PAULA STEIN Board President —
BOB HAYES Board President —
JUDITH MEAD Treasurer —
MOLLY BACHECHI Board Member —
JOCELYN CASTILLO Board Member —
DON MILLER Board Member —
KATIE SNAPP Board Member —
CHARLOTTE WALTON Board Member —
TERRY FARMER Board Member —
MITCH VIGIL Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
40 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
100 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 84 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 68 points above the peer median (100 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.