Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ross Decker Board President
Catherine Decker Secretary
Jodee Lord Treasurer
Mary Aloia Board Member
Jacques Stewart Artistic Director
Rich Gainer Jr Board Member
Bronwyn Fugate Board Member
Carol Griffin Board Member
Susanne Gainer Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ross Decker Board President
Catherine Decker Secretary
Jodee Lord Treasurer
Mary Aloia Board Member
Jacques Stewart Artistic Director
Rich Gainer Jr Board Member
Bronwyn Fugate Board Member
Brendan O'Brien Board Member
Tom McGinley Board Member
Jennifer Mistretta Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points above the peer median (65 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.