Governance Lag
What does this mean?
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
The Path Forward
The Scaffold
Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 1.0% | 42 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 38 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rishi Wagle | Board President | — | ||
| Hannah Holman | Board President | — | ||
| Anne O'Neill | Treasurer | — | ||
| Jenny Juehring | Secretary | — | ||
| Ron May | Board Member | — | ||
| Matt Manweiler | Board Member | — | ||
| Lelsie O'Ryan | Board Member | — | ||
| Kay Hall | Board Member | — | ||
| Matt Bishop | Board Member | — | ||
| Paula Hartmann | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Clift | Executive Director | 1.2% of Rev | ||
| Not | Applicable | — | ||
| Joseph Lohmuller | Board President | — | ||
| Rishi Wagle | Board President | — | ||
| Eric Spriet | Treasurer | — | ||
| Tim Gulbranson | Secretary | — | ||
| Ron May | Board Member | — | ||
| Matt Manweiler | Board Member | — | ||
| Hannah Holman | Artistic Director | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 111 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points above the peer median (75 vs. 48).
5-year trend: Governance Lag
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
What's driving this score
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.