Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | 77.7% | 52 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 73.1% | 48 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Pelletier | Executive Director | 66.5% of Rev | ||
| Jim Zientek | Board Member | — | ||
| Dave Maillox | Board Member | — | ||
| Tom Lofstrom | Board Member | — | ||
| John Wolff | Board Member | — | ||
| Ken Kosior | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Pelletier | Executive Director | 51.7% of Rev | ||
| Jim Zientek | Board Member | — | ||
| Dave Maillox | Board Member | — | ||
| Tom Lofstrom | Board Member | — | ||
| John Wolff | Board Member | — | ||
| Ken Kosior | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 6 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A9.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points above the peer median (90 vs. 39).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 29 → 61 over 4 years (improving by 32 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- Net assets declined for 3 consecutive years of deficit spending; cash runway narrowing.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.