Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
53
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 9.9% 53 Fragile Recovery
2021 47.8% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 42.9% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Aki Amai Executive Director 9.9% of Rev
George R Branner Board President
Will Stevens Secretary
Sue Milwee Tresurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Aki Amai Executive Director 33.3% of Rev
George R Branner Board President
Will Stevens Secretary
Sue Milwee Tresurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Aki Amai Executive Director 41.1% of Rev
George R Branner Board President
Will Stevens Secretary
Sue Milwee Tresurer
Thomas Hilman Officer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 49 → 53 over 4 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.