Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↓
Overall
24
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 31.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 12.4% 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM WHITEFIELD Board Member 21.6% of Rev
ROBERT ANGELINI Executive Director 19.2% of Rev
ROBERT ALLISON Board President —
JEANNE MONTANO-GIANNETTA Board President —
RANDY KORNBERG Treasurer —
CHRISTINA SMITH Board Member —
THOMAS GILMOUR Board Member —
THOMAS ARNONE Board Member —
BRIAN THOMPSON Board Member —
BRIAN O'BRIEN Board Member —
MARYLYN ROCKY Board Member —
DARRELL WILLIS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM WHITEFIELD Board Member 21.4% of Rev
ROBERT ANGELINI Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
CHRISTINA SMITH Board Member 3.0% of Rev
ROBERT ALLISON Board Member —
JEANNE MONTANO-GIANNETTA Board Member —
THOMAS GILMOUR Board Member —
THOMAS AMONE Board Member —
THOMAS MANZO Board Member —
BRIAN O'BRIEN Board Member —
MARYLYN ROCKY Board Member —
RANDY KORNBERG Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 249 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 43 points below the peer median (5 vs. 48).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~18 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.