Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data
Overall
24
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 31.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 12.4% 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM WHITEFIELD Board Member 21.6% of Rev
ROBERT ANGELINI Executive Director 19.2% of Rev
ROBERT ALLISON Board President
JEANNE MONTANO-GIANNETTA Board President
RANDY KORNBERG Treasurer
CHRISTINA SMITH Board Member
THOMAS GILMOUR Board Member
THOMAS ARNONE Board Member
BRIAN THOMPSON Board Member
BRIAN O'BRIEN Board Member
MARYLYN ROCKY Board Member
DARRELL WILLIS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM WHITEFIELD Board Member 21.4% of Rev
ROBERT ANGELINI Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
CHRISTINA SMITH Board Member 3.0% of Rev
ROBERT ALLISON Board Member
JEANNE MONTANO-GIANNETTA Board Member
THOMAS GILMOUR Board Member
THOMAS AMONE Board Member
THOMAS MANZO Board Member
BRIAN O'BRIEN Board Member
MARYLYN ROCKY Board Member
RANDY KORNBERG Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points below the peer median (5 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~18 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.