Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 16 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 22.6% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 12.1% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 13.3% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 14.4% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 13.2% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 13.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS VANN Board Member
TIM ERDMAN Board Member
JEFF HAUSER Board Member
FRED WILLIAMS Board Member
JACK KOTZ Board Member
STEVE GUMBLE Board Member
DELANIE YOUNG Board Member
TEDDY ERRICO Board Member
ANNIE BOOTH Board Member
CLARA MARTINEZ Board President
PETER BELL Executive Director

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE GUMBLE Board Member
DON HANNAH Board Member
JIM BERKOWITZ Board Member
ANNIE BOOTH Board Member
JONATHAN HARRIS Board Member
TEDDY ERRICO Board Member
JACK KOTZ Board Member
TIM ERDMAN Board Member
KURT DALTON Board Member
CHRIS VANN Board Member
FRED WILLIAMS Board Member
JEFF HAUSER Board Member
CLARA MARTINEZ Board President
DELANIE YOUNG Secretary
PETER BELL Executive Director

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE GUMBLE Board Member
DON HANNAH Board Member
JIM BERKOWITZ Board Member
ANNIE BOOTH Board Member
JONATHAN HARRIS Board Member
TEDDY ERRICO Board Member
JACK KOTZ Board Member
TIM ERDMAN Board Member
KURT DALTON Board Member
CHRIS VANN Board Member
FRED WILLIAMS Board Member
JEFF HAUSER Board Member
CLARA MARTINEZ Board President
DELANIE YOUNG Secretary
PETER BELL Executive Director

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE GUMBLE Board Member
DON HANNAH Board Member
JIM BERKOWITZ Board Member
JONATHAN HARRIS Board Member
TEDDY ERRICO Board Member
DELANIE YOUNG Board Member
JACK KOTZ Board Member
JEFF HAUSER Board Member
TIM ERDMAN Board Member
FRED WILLIAMS Board Member
KURT DALTON Board Member
CHRIS VANN Board President
CLARA MARTINEZ TREASURERSECRETARY
PETER BELL Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.