Mission Drift
What does this mean?
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
The Path Forward
The Lodestar
A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 58 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 37 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 58 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 38 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBERT HOPKINS | Board President | — | ||
| KAREN STEWART | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBERT HOPKINS | Board President | — | ||
| KAREN STEWART | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LORI MOORE | Board President | — | ||
| KAREN STEWART | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEON PARIS | Board President | — | ||
| KAREN STEWART | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 10 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points above the peer median (90 vs. 38).
5-year trend: Mission Drift
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.