Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 34.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 16.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 14.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 15.6% 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 15.4% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 16.5% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 12.7% 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 17.0% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 18.7% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 10.6% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 39.6% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lisa Hatchadoorian Executive Director 18.6% of Rev
Elizabeth Martin Executive Director 17.5% of Rev
Bev Donnelley Board Member —
Chandler Elmore Board Member —
Carmen Brooks Board Member —
Shawn Bingham Board Member —
Jared O Carter Board Member —
David Johnson Board Member —
Cory Kozisek Board Member —
Fran Hardman Board President —
Patrick Rosen Board President —
Chris Fiala Treasurer —
Patti Tyrrell Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lisa Hatchadoorian Executive Director 16.6% of Rev
Patrick Rosen Board Member —
Patti Tyrrell Board Member —
Lilliane Francuz Board Member —
Fran Hardman Board President —
Melissa Katsimpalis Board Member —
Jean Lehmann Secretary —
Bev Donnelley Board Member —
Jim Fazio Board Member —
Chris Fiala Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Fazio Board Member —
Ryan Norton Treasurer —
John Shaw Board Member —
Patti Tyrrell Board Member —
Dawn Putney Board Member —
Lilliane Francuz Board Member —
Fran Hardman Board President —
Melissa Katsimpalis Board Member —
Jean Lehmann Secretary —
Bev Donnelley Board Member —
Lisa Hatchadoorian Executive Director —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lisa Hatchadoorian Executive Director 15.5% of Rev
John Dellenbach Chairman —
Fran Hardman Board President —
Melissa Katsimpalis Board Member —
Jean Lehmann Secretary —
Megin Rux Board Member —
Bev Donnelley Board Member —
Jim Fazio Board Member —
Ryan Norton Treasurer —
John Shaw Board Member —
Patti Tyrrell Board Member —
Dawn Putney Board Member —
Lilliane Francuz Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 271 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 50 points below the peer median (0 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 34.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.