Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 91.1% | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 47 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | 72.7% | 44 | Fragile | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kishan Patel | Secretary | 38.8% of Rev | ||
| Arijit Mahalanabis | Board President | 37.4% of Rev | ||
| Sayali Phadke | Treasurer | — | ||
| Latha Bhushan | Board Member | — | ||
| Santhosh Girirajan | Board Member | — | ||
| Murali Haran | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arijit Mahalanabis | Board President | 44.9% of Rev | ||
| Kishan Patel | Secretary | 44.7% of Rev | ||
| Sayali Phadke | Treasurer | — | ||
| Latha Bhushan | Board Member | — | ||
| Santhosh Girirajan | Board Member | — | ||
| Murali Haran | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARIJIT MAHALANABIS | Board President | 39.5% of Rev | ||
| KISHAN PATEL | Secretary | — | ||
| SAYALI PHADKE | Treasurer | — | ||
| LATHA BHUSHAN | Board Member | — | ||
| SANTHOSH GIRIRAJAN | Board Member | — | ||
| MURALI HARAN | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 9 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A9.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points above the peer median (65 vs. 41).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Net assets declined for 3 consecutive years of deficit spending; cash runway narrowing.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.