Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 25.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 — — 24.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER RISTAU Executive Director 24.1% of Rev
WILLIAM BATKAY Board President —
BENJAMIN MILLER Board President —
MICHAEL MURRAY Treasurer —
RUSSELL HAIGHT Board Member —
BRUCE HOFFMAN Board Member —
ELIZABETH MILLER Board Member —
LIZA OCHSENDORF Board Member —
JIM MURPHY Board Member —
JEFF MEAD Board Member —
VITTORIA BUZZELLI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRISTOPHER RISTAU Executive Director 24.4% of Rev
WILLIAM BATKAY Board President —
BENJAMIN MILLER Board President —
LUCILLE LUCAS Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 124 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 68 points below the peer median (0 vs. 68).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.