Mission Drift
What does this mean?
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
The Path Forward
The Lodestar
A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 37 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 62 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 44 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 59 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Bongiovi | Board President | — | ||
| Amanda Kewley | Executive Director | — | ||
| Addie O'Beirne | Board Member | — | ||
| Joseph Bongiovi | Board President | — | ||
| Amanda Kewley | Executive Director | — | ||
| Addie O'Beirne | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Bongiovi | Board President | — | ||
| Amanda Kewley | Executive Director | — | ||
| Addie O'Beirne | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Bongiovi | Board President | — | ||
| Amanda Kewley | Executive Director | — | ||
| Addie O'Beirne | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 3 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points below the peer median (15 vs. 45).
5-year trend: Mission Drift
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
Overall score has gone from 59 → 37 over 5 years (declining by 22 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.