Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELENA SPENCER Board President
KELLY ALISON CLARK Treasurer
JENNIFER PARK Board Member
JANA HEIBER Board Member
JOEL BARD Board Member
KATIE BRANDT Board Member
AMY ALMEIDA Board Member
SHANNON BROWNE Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER PARK Board Member
JOEL BARD Artistic Director
JANA HIEBER Board Member
ELENA SPENCER Board President
KELLY ALISON CLARK Treasurer
SHANNON BROWNE Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER PARK Board Member
JOEL BARD Artistic Director
ELENA SPENCER Board President
KELLY ALISON CLARK Treasurer
SHANNON BROWNE COO
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 54 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 11 points above the peer median (45 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 43 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.