Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | — | 30 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 42 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIANA FARRELL | Board President | — | ||
| ROBERT GRAULICH | Board Member | — | ||
| SCOTLAND KING | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHAEL OHALLORAN | Board President | — | ||
| CINDY DRENNAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| MAGGIE THOMPSON | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIANA FARRELL | Board President | 3.0% of Rev | ||
| MICHAEL OHALLORAN | Board Member | 0.5% of Rev | ||
| MAGGIE THOMPSON | Secretary | — | ||
| WALTER YENKOSKY | Board Member | — | ||
| MINDILYN CHAPANIAN | Board Member | — | ||
| JOANNE DEBLIS | Treasurer | — | ||
| ROBERT GRAULICH | Board President | — | ||
| DAVID HEADLAND | Board Member | — | ||
| SCOTLAND KING | Board Member | — | ||
| MAGGIE THOMPSON | Secretary | — | ||
| WALTER YENKOSKY | Board Member | — | ||
| ASHLEY CHANEY | Board Member | — | ||
| AXEL M JUAREZ | Board Member | — | ||
| MINDILYN CHAPANIAN | Board Member | — | ||
| DIANA FARRELL | Board President | — | ||
| ROBERT GRAULICH | Board President | — | ||
| DAVID HEADLAND | Board Member | — | ||
| SCOTLAND KING | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHAEL OHALLORAN | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.