Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
38
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.7% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 — — 13.9% 41 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 13.8% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 10.3% 43 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Graham Powers General Manager 17.8% of Rev
Aden Travis Employee 7.0% of Rev
Thomas Herman Tech 6.3% of Rev
Laselle Colvin Employee 0.4% of Rev
Sara Herman Employee 0.4% of Rev
Brisa Ramirez Employee 0.3% of Rev
Aden Genereaux Employee 0.2% of Rev
Sherry Edwards Board Member —
James Nairne Treasurer —
Rick Andrews Executive Director —
Jim Koch Board Member —
Cheryl Hutchinson Board Member —
Brenda Briggs Membership Management —
Gerilyn May Board Member —
Kevin Maher Board Member —
Beth Milligan Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Graham Powers General Manager 14.9% of Rev
Thomas Herman Tech 7.8% of Rev
James Fuqua Employee 3.9% of Rev
Sara Herman Employee 0.2% of Rev
Jack Doyle Employee 0.2% of Rev
Patrick Egan Tech 0.1% of Rev
Blake Miller Employee 0.0% of Rev
Sherry Edwards Board Member —
Jeff Slocombe Secretary —
James Nairne Treasurer —
Rick Andrews Executive Director —
Jim Koch Board Member —
Cheryl Hutchinson Board Member —
Brenda Briggs Membership Management —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nichole Miller General Manager 7.6% of Rev
Thomas Herman Tech 7.5% of Rev
Abigail Koprowicz Tech 2.2% of Rev
Patrick Egan Tech 0.7% of Rev
Jack Doyle Employee 0.2% of Rev
Blake Miller Employee 0.2% of Rev
Kevin Maher Board Member —
Sherry Edwards Board Member —
Jeff Slocombe Secretary —
James Nairne Treasurer —
Rick Andrews Executive Director —
Jim Koch Board Member —
Cheryl Hutchinson Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ezekiel Smith Tech 4.5% of Rev
Thomas Herman Tech 4.2% of Rev
Nichole Miller General Manager 2.8% of Rev
Patrick Egan Tech 0.5% of Rev
Abigail Koprowicz Tech 0.1% of Rev
Kevin Maher Board Member —
Sherry Edwards Board Member —
Jeff Slocombe Secretary —
James Nairne Treasurer —
Rick Andrews Executive Director —
Jim Koch Board Member —
Cheryl Hutchinson Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thomas Herman Tech 3.5% of Rev
Ezekiel Smith Tech 3.4% of Rev
Patrick Egan Tech 1.0% of Rev
Olivia Harnack Tech 0.7% of Rev
Larry Domine Board Member —
Denise Genoa Board Member —
Sherry Edwards Board Member —
Jeff Slocombe Secretary —
James Nairne Treasurer —
Rick Andrews Executive Director —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (45 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.