Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 3.4% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA VIRGIN Board President
KELLY DIMARIA Treasurer
HEIDI BONCHER Secretary
MATTHEW CIMAGLIA Board Member
ELIZABETH DUDLEY Board Member
STEVEN GIACONA Board Member
DAN GUIN Board Member
ROBERT FRIEZO Board Member
PATRICIA KILGALLON Board Member
ALEX ROSEMURGY Board Member
ROGER STEIN Board Member
JOHN TOLBERT Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA VIRGIN Board President
KELLY DIMARIA Treasurer
HEIDI BONCHER Secretary
MATTHEW CIMAGLIA Board Member
ELIZABETH DUDLEY Board Member
STEVEN GIACONA Board Member
DAN GUIN Board Member
ROBERT FRIEZO Board Member
PATRICIA KILGALLON Board Member
ALEX ROSEMURGY Board Member
ROGER STEIN Board Member
JOHN TOLBERT Board Member
ANDREA VIRGIN Board President
DAN GUIN Board President
KELLY DIMARIA Treasurer
PATRICIA KILGALLON Board Member
ROGER STEIN Board Member
ELIZABETH DUDLEY Board Member
JOHN TOLBERT Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.