Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
44
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 22.2% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 — — 20.3% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 9.8% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 8.8% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 1.0% 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY MORRISON Executive Director 15.8% of Rev
JOY ZINOMAN Board Member 4.5% of Rev
KATE DEBELACK Board Member 1.3% of Rev
SERGE SEIDEN Board Member 1.3% of Rev
JONATHAN PITT Board Member —
MEREDITH GARAGIOLA Board President —
SOLOMON HAILESELASSIE Board Member —
JAMIE CROWNE Secretary —
JILL FIELDS Treasurer —
KEITH HANSEN Board Member —
AJ CALBERT Board President —
VINCENT BROWN Board Member —
JOE CREA Board Member —
ANIKA HARDEN Board Member —
DARNELL EATON Board Member —
ANDREA HATFIELD Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY MORRISON Executive Director 15.1% of Rev
JOY ZINOMAN Board Member 4.8% of Rev
KATE DEBELACK Board Member 1.2% of Rev
SERGE SEIDEN Board Member 1.1% of Rev
JONATHAN PITT Board Member —
MEREDITH GARAGIOLA Board President —
SOLOMON HAILESELASSIE Board Member —
JAMIE CROWNE Secretary —
JILL FIELDS Treasurer —
KEITH HANSEN Board Member —
AJ CALBERT Board President —
VINCENT BROWN Board Member —
VICTORIA MURRAY BAATIN Board Member —
JOE CREA Board Member —
ANIKA HARDEN Board Member —
DARNELL EATON Board Member —
ANDREA HATFIELD Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOE GRAF GENERAL MANAGER & REGISTRA 8.3% of Rev
EMILY MORRISON Executive Director 6.4% of Rev
JOY ZINOMAN Board Member 2.1% of Rev
JAMIE CROWNE Secretary 1.8% of Rev
KATE DEBELACK Board Member 1.3% of Rev
SERGE SEIDEN Board Member 1.0% of Rev
JONATHAN PITT Board President —
MEREDITH GARAGIOLA Board President —
SOLOMON HAILESELASSIE Board Member —
JILL FIELDS Board Member —
KEITH HANSEN Board Member —
AJ CALBERT Treasurer —
VINCENT BROWN Board Member —
VICTORIA MURRAY BAATIN Board Member —
ANIKA HARDEN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOE GRAF GENERAL MANAGER & REGISTRA 7.8% of Rev
JOY ZINOMAN Board President 6.1% of Rev
KATE DEBELACK Secretary 1.5% of Rev
SERGE SEIDEN Treasurer 1.4% of Rev
AJ CALBERT JOINED 12152020 Board Member —
VINCENT BROWN JOINED 12152020 Board Member —
JONATHAN PITT Board President —
MEREDITH GARAGIOLA Board President —
MARVIN BOWSER Board Member —
JAMIE CROWNE Board Member —
JILL FIELDS Board Member —
KEITH HANSEN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOE GRAF GENERAL MANAGER & REGISTRAR 3.3% of Rev
JOY ZINOMAN Board President 2.8% of Rev
JONATHAN PITT Board President —
MEREDITH GARAGIOLA Board President —
SERGE SEIDEN Treasurer —
KATE DEBELACK Secretary —
MARVIN BOWSER Board Member —
JAMIE CROWNE Board Member —
JILL FIELDS Board Member —
KEITH HANSEN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 106 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 22 points below the peer median (45 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.