Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 0.4% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rhonda Lake Board Member
Kate Hesser Board Member
Nancy Tellez Board Member
Kristi Capek Board Member
Shaylene Smith Board President
Jennifer Robison Vice President
Julie Fahrlander Secretary
Russell Cowan Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Crystal Alarcon Board Member
Rhonda Lake Board Member
Nancy Tellez Board Member
Kate Hesser Board Member
Jennifer Robison Vice President
Shaylene Smith Board President
Julie Fahrlander Secretary
Russell Cowan Treasurer
Lacey Franzen Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shaylene Smith Board President
Jennifer Robison Vice President
Julie Farlander Secretary
Russell Cowan Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 5 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 20 points above the peer median (60 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 55 over 5 years (improving by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.