Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 15.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 12.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 4.8% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2020 4.2% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melissa Kim Founder 14.8% of Rev
Keith Wood Board Member
Charlie Elkins Board Member
Danielle Smith Secretary
Bobby Smith Board Member
Ed Pratt Treasurer
Wendy Mitchell Board Member
Josh Perkins Chairman

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melissa Snow Board President 6.2% of Rev
Keith Wood Board Member
Carla Rogers Treasurer
Danielle Smith Secretary
Bobby Smith Board Member
Ed Pratt Board Member
Josh Perkins Chairman

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jennifer Pasos Sponsorship Dir
Melissa Snow Founder
Keith Wood Chairman
Brian Snow Board Member
Carla Rogers Board Member
Danielle Smith Board Member
Bobby Smith Board Member
Ed Pratt Board Member
Gelila Shewaye Grounds Direct
Josh Perkins Board Member
Clarissa Perkins Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 4,835 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix Q3.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 26 over 5 years (declining by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.