Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
70
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 62 Stable Stable Watch
2020 9.0% 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melissa Bernstein Board President
Courtney Cole Treasurer
Karen Woodrow Secretary
Gene Hooper Board Member
Tamika Olszewski Board Member
Shalini Prasad Board Member
Vivian Liu-Somers Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melissa Bernstein Board President 5.4% of Rev
Courtney Cole Treasurer
Karen Woodrow Secretary
Paul Victor Walsh Board Member
Tamika Olszewski Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
70 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (70 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 49 → 53 over 4 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.