Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 5.9% 57 Fragile Recovery
2023 57 Fragile Recovery
2022 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN PIAZZA Artistic Director 5.9% of Rev
MICHAEL ANTIN Board Member
ELLEN KANE Treasurer
MARVIN LIEBMAN Board President
JACKIE OLESKER Board President
DEBORAH MACMURRAY Secretary
JULIE NEWMAN Board Member
SY SILVERBERG Board President
MIHRAN KALAYDJIAN Board Member
JUDY TRESTER Board Member
JUDY ROSEN Board President
JOHN O'REILLY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL ANTIN Board Member
ELLEN KANE Treasurer
MARVIN LIEBMAN Board President
JACKIE OLESKER Board President
DEBORAH MACMURRAY Secretary
JULIE NEWMAN Board Member
SY SILVERBERG Vice President
EBONY TOLAND Legal Advisor
STEPHEN PIAZZA Artistic Director
JUDY TRESTER Board Member
DAVE WESTON Board Member
JUDY ROSEN Board President
STEVE WOLOSHIN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points above the peer median (75 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.