Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DINA LUKASKO Board President 2.9% of Rev
THERESA BARCUS EX OFFICIO M
LISA BLEILE Board President
MARY LISA BOOSE Board President
JEFF COOK VICE PRESIDE
VANESSA COOK Secretary
RYLIE MULLEN Board President
TINA RUFFING Board President
KATHLEEN SIGSWORTH Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THERESA BARCUS EX OFFICIO M
LISA BLEILE Board President
MARY LISA BOOSE Board President
JEFF COOK VICE PRESIDE
VANESSA COOK Secretary
FARRAH HALES Board President
DINA LUKASKO Board President
TINA RUFFING Board President
KATHLEEN SIGSWORTH Treasurer
PAIGE WESOLOWSKI-GREEN Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BROOKE GFELL Board President
LISA BLEILE Board President
TIINA RUFFING Board President
DINA LUKASKO Board President
PETER MIRAGLIOTTA Sr Board President
KATHLEEN SIGSWORTH Treasurer
JEFFREY COOK Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (60 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.