Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN SALIENKO TREASURERSECRETARY
Dena Mercer Board President
WILLIAM RENTFROW Board Member
BARB PORTZEN Board Member
ROBERT GOZSKOWICZ Board Member
ANDREA TURNQUIST Board Member
HANNAH FORMELLA Board Member
PAULA D SCHLICE Board Member
SHANNON RUTTA Board Member
EMILY ABBOTT Board Member
VICTORIA SCHULTZ Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA SCHULTZ Board President
KAREN SALIENKO TREASURERSECRETARY
Dena Mercer Board President
WILLIAM RENTFROW Board Member
BARB PORTZEN Board Member
ROBERT GOZSKOWICZ Board Member
MARY HICKETHIER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA SCHULTZ Board President
KAREN SALIENKO TREASURERSECRETARY
Dena Mercer Board President
WILLIAM RENTFROW Board Member
KEVIN JORGENSON Board Member
ROBERT GOZSKOWICZ Board Member
JESSE SCHULTZ Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 103 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points below the peer median (15 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.