Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | 22.6% | 41 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexis Weber | Executive Director | 37.3% of Rev | ||
| Tim Hale | Treasurer | — | ||
| Denise Christensen | Board Member | — | ||
| Janet Erickson | Board President | — | ||
| Doug Monson | Board Member | — | ||
| Eileen Hale | Board Member | — | ||
| Corinne Storey | Secretary | — | ||
| Annie Heiner | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lxi Weber | Executive Director | 22.6% of Rev | ||
| Tim Hale | Treasurer | — | ||
| Denise Christensen | Board Member | — | ||
| Val Bagley | Board Member | — | ||
| Janet Erickson | Board President | — | ||
| Doug Monson | Board Member | — | ||
| Eileen Hale | Board Member | — | ||
| Corinne Storey | Secretary | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 21 other orgs in WY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 16 points below the peer median (45 vs. 61).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 22.6% is modestly above the sector's healthy band (18–22%) — worth monitoring.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.