Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 21.6% 49 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 29.6% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 21.0% 49 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 19.8% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 27.3% 50 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 1.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 12.9% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 9.6% 46 Fragile Recovery
2013 18.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 17.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 13.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
QUINN GOLDHAMMER EXECUTIVE DI 21.6% of Rev
GINA HOOGENDOORN Board President
CHRIS RINGER VICE PRESIDE
SARA OLSEN Secretary
ADANAEL RUIZ Treasurer
DARA CORKERY Board Member
VERLYN VELLE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
QUINN GOLDHAMMER EXECUTIVE DI 20.7% of Rev
TIM WILLIAMS Board President
DARA CORKERY VICE PRESIDE
ANNA CAFFEE Secretary
ROBBIE MCLELAND Treasurer
DARLA SISEL Board Member
LYN VELLE Board Member
RACHELLE PEARSON Board Member
WENDY GAUNTNER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 3 other orgs in WY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points above the peer median (60 vs. 25).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 49 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.