Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 49 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 36 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thayer Tutt Board President
Deb Mahan Board President
Pamela Shockley-Zalabak Board President
Susan Edmondson Secretary
Julianna Bond Treasurer
Bruce Kopper Treasurer
Rob Brasch Treasurer
Bill Cosper Board Member
Frank DeLay Board Member
Mary Osborne Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nathan Newbrough Executive Director 101.5% of Rev
Thayer Tutt Board President
Susan Edmondson Board President
Mary Osborne Chairman Emeritus
Ron Brasch Treasurer
Bruce Kopper Board Member
Bob Allen Street Board Member
Pamela Shockley-Zalabak Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thayer Tutt Jr Board President
Susan Edmondson Secretary
Bruce Kopper Treasurer
Ron Brasch Board Member
Mary Osborne Board Member
Bob Allen Street Board Member
Pamela Shockley-Zalabak Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 10 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (60 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.