Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
26
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN LOPEZ Board Member
SHARA MAIN Executive Director
LINDA PAULINE Treasurer
NIKKI DESOUZA Board Member
DESTY OLSON Secretary
KYLE CONLEY Board President
CHUCK PHALEN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN LOPEZ Board President
SHARA MAIN Board Member
CHRIS FINETTI Board Member
DAN BERNS Secretary
JENNIFER FINETTI Board Member
KYLE CONLEY Treasurer
AMANDA MOORE Board Member
BRIAN MOORE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN LOPEZ Board President
SHARA MAIN Board Member
CHRIS FINETTI Board Member
DAN BERNS Secretary
JENNIFER FINETTI Board Member
KYLE CONLEY Treasurer
AMANDA MOORE Board Member
BRIAN MOORE Board Member
KATHRYN LOPEZ Board President
SHARA MAIN Board Member
CHRIS FINETTI Board Member
DAN BERNS Secretary
JENNIFER FINETTI Board Member
KYLE CONLEY Treasurer
AMANDA MOORE Board Member
BRIAN MOORE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.