Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 47 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 47 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 7.7% | 53 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | 58.2% | 44 | Fragile | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessie Dorsey | Board Member | 4.8% of Rev | ||
| Georgia Guy | Artistic Director | 1.3% of Rev | ||
| Ryan Sturm | Board President | 1.2% of Rev | ||
| Melanie Smith | Board President | 0.5% of Rev | ||
| Tammy Roque | Secretary | — | ||
| Laurel Gramming | Board President | — | ||
| Amy Tupper | Board Member | — | ||
| Jessica Scruggs | Board Member | — | ||
| Allison Richardson | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia Guy | Artistic Director | 29.9% of Rev | ||
| Ryan Sturm | Board President | 1.2% of Rev | ||
| Melanie Smith | Board President | 0.4% of Rev | ||
| Tammy Roque | Secretary | — | ||
| Laurel Gramming | Board President | — | ||
| Amy Tupper | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia Guy | Treasurer | 22.4% of Rev | ||
| Melanie Smith | Treasurer | — | ||
| Tammy Roque | Board Member | — | ||
| Ryan Sturm | Board Member | — | ||
| Laurel Grammig | Board President | — | ||
| Amy Tupper | Board President | — | ||
| Ryan Bernier | Board Member | — | ||
| Whitney Howard | Secretary | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 25 points above the peer median (55 vs. 30).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 44 → 47 over 4 years (improving by 3 points).
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.